NOC | Postmaster

Network Operations Center · Postmaster and Abuse Information

This page is written for network operators, mail server administrators, postmasters, abuse desks and security teams that interact with Specialist Linux Solutions infrastructure — whether you are sending mail to us, receiving mail from us, or investigating traffic to or from our networks. It documents how our filtering and blocking works, what a delisting request must contain, and how to reach us.

If you are a customer looking for product or technical support, use our regular support channels. Support requests sent to the abuse address are redirected and only lose you time.

Blocklist Lookup

The tools below query our internal reputation and blocking databases in real time and report whether an IP address or a domain is currently listed, the nature of the block and when it was last triggered.

Two things to keep in mind. First, these lookups cover our infrastructure only: a clean result here says nothing about your status on public DNSBLs or at large mailbox providers. Second, the lookup is read-only — it does not open a delisting request and does not notify anyone. To request removal, follow the delisting procedure.

Why an IP Address Gets Blocked

Blocks are applied automatically when our monitoring detects traffic that threatens the security, stability or reputation of our infrastructure. Most are temporary and expire on their own. Repeated incidents, or the absence of any corrective action, escalate the block to a longer or permanent one.

Common triggers:

  • Spam or unsolicited bulk email delivered to our users;
  • Open relays, open proxies and misconfigured web forms used as mail injectors;
  • Malware, virus-bearing attachments or malicious URLs in message bodies;
  • Botnet traffic, port scanning and coordinated probing;
  • Phishing and credential-harvesting campaigns;
  • High complaint rates from our users;
  • Excessive invalid recipients (directory harvesting or dictionary attacks);
  • Repeated SMTP, IMAP, POP3 or webmail authentication failures (brute force and password spraying);
  • Repeated violations of the policies linked at the end of this page.

Where a usable abuse contact exists in WHOIS, RDAP or equivalent public records, we attempt to notify it. We do not guarantee notification: automated blocks are applied first, and reported afterwards when a contact is available and responsive.

Short-lived rate limits and brute-force blocks clear by themselves. Please do not open a delisting request for one unless it is actually holding up production traffic.

Why a Domain Gets Blocked

Domain-level blocks are a last resort. IP-level controls are more precise and cause far less collateral damage, so we use them whenever they are effective. A domain is blocked only when they are not, typically because:

  • Abusive traffic rotates across many IP addresses under the same domain;
  • The sending infrastructure changes faster than it can be blocked;
  • The domain is used in phishing or malware distribution;
  • The domain appears in the URLs of spam campaigns, even when the messages are sent from third-party infrastructure;
  • Overall domain reputation is severely compromised.

Worth stating explicitly, because it causes a lot of confusion: a domain can be listed for appearing in message content, not for sending anything. If your domain is hosted somewhere with an open redirect, a hijacked page or an abused URL shortener, spam sent by a third party from unrelated IPs is enough to get it listed. Blocks may apply to the envelope sender, the From: header, the HELO/EHLO name or URLs in the body, depending on where the abuse was observed.

Delisting Procedure

Send delisting requests to [email protected], preferably from an address inside the network or domain concerned. Requests sent from unrelated free-mail accounts are handled at low priority.

Include, in the body of the message (not as a screenshot):

  1. The exact IP addresses or domains affected, one per line;
  2. Timestamps in UTC and the full SMTP response text our servers returned — the 4xx/5xx lines straight from your logs;
  3. The technical root cause. “We don’t know yet” is acceptable only when accompanied by what you have already ruled out;
  4. The corrective action applied, in verifiable detail: which host or account was compromised, what was patched, which credentials were rotated, what was removed;
  5. Evidence that the source has stopped emitting abusive traffic;
  6. An abuse contact that actually works, for future incidents.

Requests that consist only of a removal demand, that assert “we do not send spam” without supporting data, or that are resubmitted unchanged after a rejection, will be rejected again. Every request is reviewed by a person, not by a script; expect a response measured in business days.

Email Authentication Requirements

Authentication is not a formality here: it is what lets us distinguish your legitimate traffic from someone forging your domain. Mail that fails all of the checks below is far more likely to be rejected or filtered, regardless of content.

  • SPF — publish a record authorizing every legitimate sending source. Stay within the RFC 7208 limit of 10 DNS lookups: a record that exceeds it evaluates to a permanent error and is treated as unauthenticated. Never end the record with “+all”; use “~all” or “-all”.
  • DKIM — sign all outbound mail. Use 2048-bit keys; 1024-bit is the accepted floor, not a target. Rotate selectors periodically and remove the retired public keys from DNS.
  • DMARC — publish a policy with a working aggregate report address and actually read the reports it produces. A policy of “none” is fine while you are measuring, but it is a starting point, not a destination. Make sure at least one of SPF or DKIM aligns with the domain in the From header: SPF passing on a bounce domain that does not align gives you nothing under DMARC.
  • Reverse DNS (PTR) — every sending IP must have one. Generic, dynamic-looking or absent reverse DNS on a mail source is a strong negative signal.
  • Forward-confirmed reverse DNS — the name returned by the PTR must resolve back to the same IP address. A PTR pointing to a name with no matching A or AAAA record is worse than no PTR at all.
  • HELO/EHLO — must be a fully qualified domain that resolves, and should match the PTR of the connecting IP. Bare IP literals, “localhost” and invented names are treated as abuse indicators.
  • List-Unsubscribe — bulk senders should provide both the List-Unsubscribe header and RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe, and honour requests within two days. Major providers now require this, and so do we for any high-volume stream.

Deliverability Best Practices

  • Send only to recipients who opted in, and keep the proof: date, source and IP of the subscription;
  • Suppress hard bounces immediately and retire addresses that soft-bounce repeatedly;
  • Keep complaint rates below 0.1%. Above roughly 0.3%, expect throttling from every large provider;
  • Separate transactional traffic from marketing traffic — different IPs, and ideally different subdomains, so one cannot poison the other;
  • Use authenticated submission (port 587 with STARTTLS, or 465 with implicit TLS) for anything originating from an application or a workstation;
  • Warm new IP addresses and new domains gradually; a volume spike from a cold IP looks exactly like a compromise;
  • Avoid URL shorteners and long redirect chains — they hide the destination and are heavily abused, so they are scored accordingly;
  • Keep the subject line honest and consistent with the body;
  • Do not use a free-mail domain in the From header of bulk mail;
  • Comply with the applicable privacy legislation (LGPD in Brazil, GDPR in the EU, and equivalents);
  • Monitor your own reputation continuously instead of discovering problems from rejection messages.

Reputation and Blocklist Checks

Before contacting us, check whether the problem is broader than our network. If you are listed at Spamhaus, you are almost certainly listed with us as well, and fixing the source resolves both.

Major Provider Postmaster Resources

  • Google Postmaster Tools — domain-based reputation, authentication and spam rate for Gmail;
  • Microsoft SNDS — Smart Network Data Services, IP-based data for Outlook.com, Hotmail and Live. The service moved to this address during 2026; update any automation still pointing at the old sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com URLs;
  • Microsoft JMRP — Junk Email Reporting Program, Microsoft’s complaint feedback loop, now enrolled from inside the SNDS portal;
  • Yahoo Sender Hub — complaint feedback loop and sender services for Yahoo and AOL, which share the same filtering infrastructure. The former standalone AOL postmaster no longer exists;
  • Yahoo Postmaster — documentation and delisting requests for Yahoo and AOL;
  • Apple iCloud Mail Postmaster — sending policies for iCloud Mail.

Google Postmaster Tools is keyed by domain and Microsoft SNDS is keyed by IP address. If you send from IP space you do not control, only the domain-side tools are available to you.

SMTP Security and Inbound Filtering

Connections to our MX servers are evaluated against, among other criteria:

  • TLS availability and negotiated version;
  • Reverse DNS, forward-confirmed reverse DNS and HELO/EHLO consistency;
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC evaluation, including alignment;
  • Public DNSBL and URIBL listings;
  • Our own historical reputation data for the source IP, network and domain;
  • Rate limits per IP address, per sender and per recipient;
  • Anti-spam content analysis and anti-malware scanning of bodies and attachments.

We do not publish thresholds or scoring weights, for the obvious reason. Filtering rules and additional validation mechanisms may be added or changed at any time, without prior notice, when required to protect the platform.

Abuse Handling Policy

We operate a zero-tolerance policy towards spam, malware, phishing, botnet traffic, open relays, unauthorized bulk email, email spoofing and fraudulent activity of any kind.

Traffic matching these categories may be blocked automatically, without prior notice and without a manual review preceding the block. Review happens on request, after the fact, through the delisting procedure. This is a deliberate trade-off: protecting our users comes before minimizing false positives, and we would rather correct a wrong block than let an active campaign run while a ticket is triaged.

Network Information

Specialist Linux Solutions operates across multiple networks and data centers for redundancy, resilience and availability. Current locations:

UNDER

  • Facility: Scala Data Centers, Barueri/SP, Brazil;
  • ASN: 28209 (Under Serviços de Internet Ltda).

Amazon Web Services

  • ASN: 16509;
  • Multiple availability zones within Brazil.

For security reasons we do not publish the complete IP allocations in use internally. Prefixes and routing policy for the networks above can be obtained from the respective ASNs through any public looking glass or route collector.

Connectivity

  • Multiple upstream providers with redundant connectivity;
  • Dual-stack IPv4 and IPv6;
  • ICMP echo request and reply are permitted to our public hosts — please use them for reachability tests before opening a ticket;
  • Certain UDP traffic is filtered for security reasons;
  • Intermediate hops may rate-limit or deprioritize ICMP. Loss displayed mid-path in a traceroute is not evidence of loss end to end; compare against the final hop before reporting a problem.

Security and Abuse Contact

Abuse reports, reputation issues, delisting requests and security matters: [email protected]. Please write in English or Portuguese, include full headers and raw logs where relevant, and keep the report in the message body.

Related Resources

Last updated: September 2026